Over the last several years there have been a number of spectacular instances of carnage by shooters. The reasons for the shooters’ actions have typically fallen into the general category of mental derangement. Expressions such as “paranoid schizophrenic” and/or “social psychopath” have a way of being adduced as explanations. Experts don’t like to use expressions such as “who knows?”
I have called to the public attention in several different blog sites the incredible advancements which scientists have achieved in the use of electromagnetic and acoustic weaponry. There are Internet sites that can be googled up on remote devices that utilize such technologies. www.surveillanceissues.com was one such blog that provided a good summary with several additional links for good sources.
In brief it is entirely possible to “talk” with an individual in a crowded location, using remote devices – including orbiting, without anyone else hearing the “talk.” The technology by-passes the usual aural mechanism, using nerves near the surface of the human skin, allowing a direct electromagnetic communication with the human brain.
Powerful computers can interpret electromagnetic energy emitted by the human brain when creating words and phrases. A laboratory computer used to conduct such “communications” was said to have developed a “library” of some 60,000 words/phrases. That was back in the 1990s, as I recall. At any rate given the powerful computers available at the National Security Agency [“NSA”] and elsewhere, including foreign nations such as the United Kingdom and Israel (sic), the vocabulary must be quite large and available in several languages.
This means that remote devices controlled by government agencies such as NSA and CIA can probably “talk” to any citizen of the U.S. Indeed, they may be able to talk to anyone in the world. That might explain otherwise inexplicable, unexpected actions.
Naturally, the Department of Defense is deeply involved in “dark-ops” science and mechanical invention. DARPA was created to develop such scientific weaponry.
If the United States asserted a national interest anywhere in the world, such as the Levant, it might well employ a plethora of such weapons to attack opposition forces, political leadership and/or individuals viewed as dangerous, due to the potentials of their intellects. Attacking the brains of selected opponents makes a lot of sense, if it can be done clandestinely. If the target announced he felt himself under such attack, he could then be defamed as “crazy.” His credibility as a leader would be injured. That would be especially true if a sort of gang stalking approach was utilized in which nations, acting in conspiracy, all began to attack the target as “paranoid” and “unfit to rule.” This sets the stage for arming opponents to overthrow the “lunatic.”
Hence, the use of electromagnetic and acoustic devices must be commonplace now. The American people simply don’t know about it. They may well not want to know.
I recall watching a news-type program on the television quite a few years back in which a young woman in Tennessee, or thereabouts, told a reporter that she “could not believe that her government would lie to her.” At the time I thought this was an incredible statement. You don’t need to read Machiavelli’s THE PRINCE to understand that lying, misrepresentation, material omission and deception are commonly used tools of political communication. Damning evidence is hidden under the “National Security” shield. Some evidence has been sealed for fifty or more years.
The remarkable Irish poet, William Butler Yeats, knew politicians and newshounds well enough. He penned the lines,
“Politicians are easy men,
They tell there lies by rote;
Journalist make up their own,
And grab you by the throat.” (Paraphrased, but possibly accurate “as is.”)
Returning to the scientific for a moment, at least one prominent scientist asserted the theory that the mind was a completely electromagnetic field. As such, it would certainly be capable of experiencing electromagnetic disturbances. Have scientist achieved the ability to create “madmen” who can be directed to attack “threats” – no matter how objectively harmless the “threats” happened to be? I believe that such ability may well exist.
Why would any responsible government official order or authorize such an attack?
The president of the United States is always an intelligent person, but he is not likely to be an expert in any area of statesmanship or geostrategic ideation. Nor is he likely to be well-versed in economics, trade and monetary matters. He must be guided by “experts” in various fields. These experts may have their own broad relationship, one to the other. Or the key people who advise the experts may have such a relationship. It can be broad and deep, spanning the borders of the United States of America. Freemasonry and Jewry provide the president advisers in such a broad framework. The disproportion of either is protected from criticism about “disparate results” by the assumption of special status or by the sheer clandestine nature of the organization in which they exist as members.
Now, we know that a prominent concept amongst Freemasonry is “Order out of Chaos.” Just as there are Christian prelates who believe that they should force God to send Jesus to establish “Heaven on Earth,” there are Masonic thinkers who believe that they must create the chaos in this world which would be so terrible that the people would agree to let them then establish “order” according to their own notions.
The so-called “Arab Spring” is no more than a reprise of the Masonic 19th Century “Young Turks” movement throughout Europe, including Turkey. Do you recall the expression – “Young Turks?”
Furthermore, is anyone who is knowledgeable about such organizations and such events surprised that factions such as the “Arab Brotherhood” rose to prominence? Texe Marrs presented evidence in one of his videos that many of the prominent Sunni leaders in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, etc., were Masons. This made sense due to the prominence of the British in those areas. The British established Masonic Lodges everywhere they went.
Now, to return to the shooters of recent time. The movie theatre shooter appeared to be so drugged when discovered in his car - and for a day thereafter – that his ability to commit an efficient act of mass murder has to be wondered at. Further, witnesses in the theatre that night claimed that a there was a second shooter. Furthermore, the gear warned by the actual shooter (or shooters) completely obscured his identity, as I understood witnesses. In short there was room to wonder if he was not another “great American patsy.” Certainly, the event resonated with any desire to add to the welling chaos in America by doers of nefarious deeds. Or, in the words of the late Al Haig, “sinister forces.”
In regard to the shooter in the movie theatre, he was studying in an area of learning that has been of interest to the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency [“DIA”] for many years. Both individual human control and control of masses of humans have been studied. The MK-ULTRA program of the CIA was the most notorious example of clandestine manipulation and exploitation of involuntary citizens of the United States, but it was hardly the end of the matter.
At the top levels of the United States government and society are people in league to destroy nations and to create a global government under their control. Megalomania is not a curiosity that on rare occasions manifest itself in a leader. There are whole organizations that deserve this title. They mean to reshape the world. The Brotherhood is one such organization.
Yet, there would be opposition to the utter dismantling of the American Republic. What makes that worrisome to these visionaries is the level of firearms in citizen hands. Maybe these citizens could make the assault on America by its leaders too dangerous. It could be much worse than a pyrrhic victory; it could be a wound so severe that the time-table of the planners would be thrown into an unwelcomed Limbo.
What could such planners do? They could severely control the one valuable tool that the citizen has against the global agenda of Jewry and against the global agenda of Freemasonry (or any other globalist). They could control the citizen’s right to bear arms.
For the citizenry to have an effective defense against the martial arm of government bent on tyranny, it must have at least equality with army light infantry arms. I’m not referring to bazookas or howitzers. I’m referring to rifles and the like.
What tactic might lead to the citizenry surrendering its right to bear arms? A series of bewildering acts of mass murder against ordinary people would seem to be the catalyst. Since the scientific ability exists to select any mind for manipulation, rogue elements in government merely need to identify an enriched target. Surely by now, scientists can screen for likely “tools” utilizing a template developed for this purpose. Once a set of potential “mass murderers” has been established, perhaps aided by secular spies operated by the ADL and/or Southern Poverty Law Center, a series of finer probes could lead to a choice. Perhaps by suggesting the target try some drugs, the way to mental exploitation would be enhanced. By ever deepening penetration of the targets mind, the fatal concepts that would lead to deadly actions could be inserted.
Meanwhile, the secular spies could inaugurate a campaign of slanders, rumors, disparagements, etc. in the general community that would tend to isolate the target, while “growing” the idea that the general community was the enemy of the target in the target’s mind.
By painting the target into a corner, the rogue elements, aided by major media, could then portray the target as a “loner.” This would enhance a “team player” scenario as indicative of a normal personality trait. Others would be viewed with suspicion. This would set the stage for another “mass murder” event.
Conformity is a desirable trait from the point of view of globalist. It lends itself to modeling, or shaping. There is no genius in the mass man. Such life forms are not so threatening to the Visionaries of Order in the building of their New World.
Unfortunately for ordinary people, the past records of the two most prominent global societies have been slaughter, terror and police states, and there is no reason to believe their modus operandi will change.
Perhaps the many murderous shooters experienced over the last decade reflect the true face of the powerful societies that created them. They make golems, don’t they?