mensched4time

mood: calm

music: Alley Oop

There was a secret wall image in a cave in France that both French authorities and evolutionary theorists want to deny. The image appeared in a section of the cave system known as Bernifal Cave. I use past tense because the section of the cave at which the image appeared was closed to the public. The evidence provided by this image is so damaging to the proponents of established historical timelines and “Ages” that it may, indeed, have been annihilated by its French custodians.

I have provided a photograph of the image that appeared in Mr. Jack Cuozzo’s fascinating account of his study of Neanderthal facial remnants, especially teeth, that he entitled BURIED ALIVE!. Most of the book focused on the French specimens and the French caves in which specimen and artifacts, including “wall painting,” were discovered. I have also included an image of my paperback version’s cover, less anyone doubt its existence.

What did the wall image depict? It depicted a confrontation between a dinosaur and a mammoth.

Who is or was Jack Cuozzo that you should allocate time to this matter? Dr. Jack Cuozzo studied at Georgetown University and obtained degrees from the University of Pennsylvania (D.D.S.) and Loyola University/Chicago Graduate School of Dentistry. His specialty is Orthodontics. He has had a life-long interest in Neanderthal man.

Those familiar with these matters understand that timelines forbid any confrontation between a dinosaur and a mammoth, as dinosaurs died out some 62 million years before the mammoths roamed the Earth. Hence, the existence of a cave image depicting such confrontation cannot exist. The only conclusion that establishment authorities can reach is that any image depicting a confrontation between dinosaur and mammoth on a Bernifal Cave wall cannot be depicting such a confrontation, since it was an established fact that dinosaurs did not exist at the time of mammoths.

The sealing of the cave from further public scrutiny is the desperate act of an imprisoned class of authorities. Dr. Cuozzo stated in his book that it was likely that the French cave authorities removed this unwanted piece of evidence. Further, he attempted to interest American authorities and journals, which specialized in this area, in his photographs, speculations and conclusions without success.

The problem faced by Dr. Cuozzo was one faced by many other mavericks of science, such as Copernicus, Pasteur, et al, of massive resistance by period authorities.

The “Age of Dinosaurs” is typically presented as if the various Saurischia and Ornithischia were the only game in town. Yet, there were mammals that lived simultaneously with the dinosaurs during at least a portion of the timeline allocated to dinosaurs by experts. Although the theory of utter dinosaur annihilation has been argued as established, the various proposals that touch upon the means of its annihilation have rung hollow. If dinosaurs were destroyed by an ice-age brought on by some disaster, why would mammals not also perish? Not all dinosaurs were giants; some were the size of birds.

Further, why would the relatives of modern reptiles survive? True, they could abide in water for a while. Fresh water reptiles would seemingly be as doomed as dinosaurs. Salt-water reptiles, being cold-blooded, might find the sea water inhospitable in a big freeze of the hypothesized sort. Whether cold-blooded or warm-blooded, dinosaur-era precursors of modern reptiles would find food scarce. Additionally, the salt seas hosted ferocious fish, apparently.

The subsequent “Cambrian Explosion” is inexplicable, so it is presented theoretically as an event in which a godlike Mother Nature declared, “Life! Find a way!” (And it did.)

The established position is that Cro-Magnon Man actually did the cave paintings; Neanderthals were thought to have passed from the Earthly scene. Some experts suggest that the two primates existed in hostile clans during a sort of “overlap” era. Dr. Cuozzo challenged the distinction.

In the Neanderthal Age mammals might have dominated the Earth. Yet, there were certainly reptiles in all temperate and tropical zones. They might be lowly snakes and lizards, but they were present along with the giant mammoths. Could not this objective situation have inspired a reverse scenario in which the reptiles were dominating giants and mammals laying low to the ground? Where do theories come from? I believe that “sleight of hand” may be used in a pinch.

As pointed out by Dr. Cuozzo, there were portable cultural artifacts that were carried by Neanderthal clans [See Marshak, Roots of Civilization, La Madeleine artifacts]. He reasonably pointed out that some of them may well have been passed down for generations. On some of them have been carved snake images. Why would not images of snakes appear on the walls of the caves in France in which Neanderthal clans were said to have dwelled? [Being nomadic hunters, they might have established cave “cottages” in several locations adjacent to the usual roaming range of preferred game.] Although the Neanderthal rendered images of what he hunted, he also rendered images of what he saw. Snake images are one of the most persistent images found in antiquity.

Dr. Cuozzo found cave guides exclusively discussing mammals, as if no other animal family existed. He stated that all French authorities in this area of interest did the same. Tourists were shown images of bison, mammoth, elk, and the like. Apparently, no tourist ever thought to ask, “Where are the reptiles?”

His examination of the Bernifal Cave was, of course, different. Dr. Cuozzo’s knowledge of Bernifal Cave was provided in a guide book he had brought with him in which one Ann Sieveking described it as the only important cave in a certain section of southern France. She stated that it was open to the public. [Apparently, it was open to the public between 1976 and 1979.] Perhaps ominously, Michelin map entirely ignored Bernifal Cave. Ms. Sieveking had warned that a visitor would have to bring his own light, as the cave was unlit.

Dr. Cuozzo noted that an unlit public cave would not be a strong tourist draw. He inferred official discouragement and wondered what was in the cave.

Taking his wife and five children with him, Dr. Cuozzo ventured forth into rural France. He did not know the precise location of the cave. He probably hoped for guiding signs. Eventually, he and his “team” set forth on foot toward a farmhouse beyond which they hoped to find the cave entrance. They ignored warning signs.

The entrance to the cave had been blocked by sturdy wooden doors, which someone had broken through in the middle. The Cuozzo team entered. It was very dark, had a slippery floor and was 50 degrees F. They had four flashlights among them. Cautiously, they proceeded into it.

He snapped photographs of its walls as he proceeded. Later, while examining the photographs, he discovered the interesting image of the dinosaur-mammoth confrontation. He speculated that a Neanderthal had actually witnessed such a confrontation and rendered it on the wall. There was also the possibility that it was witnessed by an ancestral Neanderthal who rendered the scene to his clan, as it was undoubtedly a memorable fuss. Thereafter, the image passed down through the clan.

Dr. Cuozzo learned soon after his tour of the Bernifal Cave, the section in which he had photographed the dinosaur-mammoth confrontation had been sealed off from the public for some time.

Further, as Dr. Cuozzo’s stay in France progressed and the nature of his work more fully appreciated by authorities, he discovered that he was being followed by French police/intelligence. [This whole story would make a great movie.]

In regard to the cave paintings by Neanderthals this famous series of caves offered the French government a significant tourist draw. The established timeline could not be tampered with without calling into question all sorts of historical issues which authorities had considered settled. From the government’s point of view Dr. Cuozzo was a threat to the French economy. Allocations of revenues to important programs could not be allowed to be threatened by some American “snake oil” salesman.

On the other hand French academicians were not prepared to have established Jurassic and Pleistocene periods tinkered with. Theoretically, Neanderthals had died out before the Magdalenian period (Cro-Magnon) in which artifacts in the La Madeleine (Dordogne region), France were discovered with fine carvings, including snakes. Whether Neanderthal or Cro-Magnon denominated, these were crafted by men. The same applied to the sketches in Bernifal Cave. Establishment scientist may not want to face the fact of a drawing of a confrontation between a dinosaur and a mammoth. It rocks their world.

The reason that Dr. Cuozzo went to France was to further his studies on the Neanderthal Man by examining remnant teeth and jaw bone fragments. He had developed his own theories about Neanderthals, and this book was a rather detailed study of French specimens (as well as others). For this reason he had brought along photography and x-ray equipment. His two oldest sons helped with the equipment.

Although many scientists wanted to place Neanderthals into a separate species from Cro-Magnon, or early Man, Dr. Cuozzo provided evidence based on detailed study of the skull, jaw, and teeth that established Neanderthals as Man. He offered reasons why Neanderthals and Cro-Magnon Man should be considered basically the same people.

One of his conclusions was that Neanderthals aged much slower than contemporary mankind. Just as the human head today grows longer between the ages of 20-30 and 60-70, creating a “different-looking” man, so the even slower growth of the Neanderthals, accompanied by a much longer age, created in the very mature specimens a “primitive-looking” face and large head.

The error among paleontologists was supposing that Neanderthals died at about the age of forty. As a matter of evolutionary principle, their theories demand a progressively longer duration of life from ancient to modern times in mankind. Hence, no matter how long a Neanderthal actually lived, he died about forty, according to the establishment in science. Theory trumps facts!

There is no good reason to believe that Neanderthals could not make and use tools to create artifacts and cave drawings found along with their bone fragments. Incidentally, the fragments by which individuals have been identified often were but a single bit of skull or a single tooth – often partial. Creativity and imagination – and prejudice – have informed the final depiction of an ape man, Neanderthal or Cro-Magnon. Entities such as National Geographic can skillfully morph the “evolution of man” on monitors, using skills first hinted at by Walt Disney in his animated cartoons.

Nor is there good reason to suppose that a Neanderthal is less intelligent than George W. Bush. Because establishment scientists depict a Neanderthal as a primitive, muscular being, they feel that they are distant from his kind. Neanderthals cannot have fine skills or even average intelligence. [“They’re not like us.”] However, there is a significant gap in accumulated knowledge between the average Neanderthal and the average Bush that must be granted.

This brings me back to the battle between the dinosaur and the mammoth. If the image photographed by Dr. Jack Cuozzo captured an interesting scene he witnessed, why could the scene itself be an accurate rendering of a scene witnessed by a cave-dweller, whether he be called Neanderthal or Cro-Magnon? The drawing IS the photograph of its era.

If it is accurate, then it establishes a revolutionary change in the timeline of life on Earth. As for radiocarbon dating, and other dating alternates, inaccuracies and artistic “needs” by scientists play a disquieting role. An unwanted time range may be cast aside as “impossible” because “it doesn’t fit.”

Finally, Dr. Cuozzo related not only a story of scientific sleuthing by him, but he drew into it a possible torture/murder of a friend, strange phone calls, French police/intelligence stalking, and much more to render this real-life episode an exciting, thought-provoking tale.

mood: calm

music: Every Day People

Although the Ruling Circles that control American policy have struck a pose of alarm at the inexplicably truculent statements of the Iranian leadership, such leading Circles clearly were taken seriously only by the ignorant and the unfair. The United States has slowly but visibly tightened an economic noose around the Iranian nation and its financial holdings. All of this has been done as punishment for Iran’s development of nuclear energy to the point that American leaders fear Iran’s development of nuclear weapons.

These efforts by American leaders and their allies in Israel, England and the Continent, generally, to establish an economic embargo against Iran, based on phobic considerations of the future, were consistent with the Israeli doctrine of “Preventive Attacks” to forestall imagined, adverse developments.

There can be no doubt that a siege is an act of war. It initiates hostilities at a lower level. Its aim is to defeat the enemy outright, forcing surrender, or to compel it into negotiations. Clearly, the besieging nation will have the upper hand in such negotiations, creating an impression of victory.

Consider this description from Wikipedia:

“A siege is a military blockade of a city or fortress with the intent of conquering by attrition or assault. The term derives from sedere, Latin for "to sit".^[1] Generally speaking, siege warfare is a form of constant, low intensity conflict characterized by one party holding a strong, static defensive position. Consequently, an opportunity for negotiation between combatants is not uncommon, as proximity and fluctuating advantage can encourage diplomacy.

A siege occurs when an attacker encounters a city or fortress that cannot be easily taken by a

coup de main and refuses to surrender. Sieges involve surrounding the target and blocking the reinforcement or escape of troops or provision of supplies (a tactic known as "investment"^[2]), typically coupled with attempts to reduce the fortifications by means of siege engines, artillery bombardment, mining (also known as sapping), or the use of deception or treachery to bypass defences. Failing a military outcome, sieges can often be decided by starvation, thirst or disease, which can afflict either the attacker or defender.”

American intelligence on Iran and other Levantine arenas of interest has come disproportionately from the Israelis. The Israelis have had their share of Iranian Jews migrate to the Jewish state, but many others have remained in Iran. Hence, there have been Israelis possessed with intimate knowledge of Iranian culture probably since the 1960s, if not earlier. There are Jews in Iran that can – with care – be tapped for information.

Other nations such as Iraq also had Jewish populations to aid Israeli intelligence.

The fact that the Israelis have good intelligence about Levantine nations does not mean that they fully share this data with the United States. To advance Israeli interests, Israelis provide America with streams of data calculated to lead Americans along a course of action useful to the Israelis. They have the advantage of rich and powerful agents, well-organized and strategically positioned in the United States, who can create pressure to follow Israeli-created scenarios. This was vividly manifested by the Neo-Conservative Movement, which was dominated by Jews such as the Irving and William Kristol, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, et cetera.

As a matter of fact, according to Wikipedia, William Kristol was vigorously lobbying President Clinton for war in the Levant. Consider:

“Kristol was a leading proponent of the Iraq War. In 1998, he and other prominent foreign policy experts sent a letter to President Clinton urging a stronger posture against Iraq. Kristol argued that Saddam Hussein posed a grave threat to the United States and its allies: ‘The only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that Iraq will be able to use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction. In the near term, this means a willingness to undertake military action as diplomacy is clearly failing. In the long term, it means removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power. That now needs to become the aim of American foreign policy.’^[7]”

Clearly, precisely the same alarming commentary that was used to provoke and induce William Clinton and America into “nation building” in Iraq, and which was later successfully employed against the Bush Administration, generating the Second Desert Storm War, has been used today by the proponents of war with Iran.

The United States has electronic capacities, or high-tech capabilities, in intelligence to produce a certain level of understanding. However, interpretations may be required that may not be accurate. However, intelligence of this kind, joined with Israeli agents’ clandestine intelligence data, may produce an image that seems to be true. But is Israeli intelligence completely accurate? Up to a point. With an ally like Israel, the United States can never be sure that it is rolling a “Trojan horse” into Iran, as opposed to receiving one from Israel.

Probably the increasingly diverse immigration policies which have especially manifested themselves from the 1970s onward were partially motivated by a desire to get more effective agents operating in several problem areas of the world that were also thought to be key strategic loci. But control over such migrant agents for an amorphous culture such as modern America would itself be problematic. Not secured by the constraints of a lifetime American, such migrant agents would be ripe to become “double agents.” Where the American seedline does not even exist, migrant agents might well “take root” where “the money is greenest.”

I doubt that such agents will provide information that is any more useful than that of the Israelis. However, I do applaud any effort at liberating our intelligence from the nearly exclusive Levantine contributions of Israel (sic).

Virtually every day I hear a report on the radio that warns of new Iranian threats. They threaten here; they threaten us there. However, the actions of the United States have rarely been described as warlike or threatening. Many of the U.S. “black ops” against Iran were ignored by the radio station I listened to, by the television I watched, and by major newspapers’ front pages I saw. If small media outlets such as American Free Press did not exist, then I would never know about them at all.

Occasionally, something of the Stuxnet-type event occurs, and the American public gets a glimpse of Iran the Attacked, as opposed to the “diabolical fanatical, terrorist attacker.”

The United States has military bases all over the world. It has completely surrounded Iran with military bases. Complying with Israeli and Zionist pressure, the United States has led an economic embargo to surround and isolate Iran. Israelis have been fingered as the source of the Stuxnet virus that infected the Siemens computer devices used by Iran. Theoretically, this virus could infect Siemens-based cyber-systems around the globe.

Incidentally, the attacks on American computer system by “Chinese hackers” may actually be an Israeli-Chinese cyber-probe. The Israelis have worked with Chinese on various projects for years. The now-defunct Spotlight news-tabloid regularly reported on Israeli resell of American defense and high-tech equipment to China. The whole communist system in China was dependent on several Jewish advisers who were at Mao Tze-Tung’s side. Texe Marrs actually published a photograph of a young Mao standing amid five Jewish advisers, one of whom was honored by the Communist Party in the early 2000s.

It now appears that enemies of Iran in America are diligently working to create an “Iranian attack” on some structure in America which will justify President Obama declaring war on Iran to punish “evil in our time.” Every day on the radio, the radio experts discover some new Iranian terrorist cell or plot to create one. When that isn’t happening, al Qaeda is still threatening the U.S. I believe that it is inevitable that American media will report a “diabolical accord” between Iran and al Qaeda to blow up and/or burn down America. A wrathful American public will demand war. President Obama wins re-election.

Nevertheless, it appears that most of these “home-grown” terrorists more closely resemble typical “patsies” than legitimate threats. There appears to be a fedcop connection to almost all of them. The fedcops simulate potential terrorists/disgruntled Americans, who seem to be the sine qua non of the terrorist event that resulted in the arrest and media coverage.

One recalls the bromide: “Choose your enemies well, for you will become your enemy.”

mood: calm

music: Easy Like Sunday Morning

There still seems to be an incorrect notion that petroleum is the short term future of America. Although President Obama may allude to other forms of energy, the suggestions tend to be ludicrous, such as “wind power.” What is needed short term until something more reliable comes along is nuclear energy. The federal government is the only organization that has the money to operate the facilities at a fail-safe level. It is the only American organization that has an immediate interest in establishing a major source of electrical energy entirely removed from a profit motivation.

Customarily in America, there is all talk and hardly any action. Grid-lock develops because the two-party system is mostly composed of “kept people.” Oil companies have an interest in profits developed from various petroleum sales. Hence, they have an interest in the continuation of all the steps required for petroleum selling to continue. This oil company interest has as an important component the development of political support for their various oil programs. Hence, supporting political candidates who are friendly toward their interests becomes a survival mechanism.

All companies that have an interest in the internal combustion engine will also want to support political candidates who are friendly toward the industries that provide fuel for internal combustion engines. In this context political donations become tools that leverage their arguments for legislation that favors their programs and projects.

‘Tis said: He who pays the piper calls the tune.

This situation keeps a nation captive to old technologies. It begins to die. To save its life, it will provoke wars to commandeer other nations’ natural resources. It becomes a kind of parasite, or worse, vampire.

In the name of the country the federal government should purchase all nuclear energy plants in private hands, taking them if it must. A fair and just price should be paid for each facility.

Some of the present nuclear facilities are thirty or forty years old. They are at least as old as the Japanese facility at Fukushima Daiichi. They aren’t safe, even though industry spokespeople and government “experts” assure the American public of their safety. Do Americans actually believe that they would inveigh against them as unsafe? They probably believe that telling the truth is irresponsible. The ignorant citizens might panic. That seemed to be the battle plan of the Japanese authorities.

Since it takes some years to plan and construct a nuclear facility, the American people should insist that this option be taken. The planning should include a multi-layered approach to safety each layer of which is deemed to be fail-safe. Further, the definition of “fail-safe” should not be “reasonably fail-safe” but a scheme of protection that is absolutely safe against nature and madmen.

Currently operating facilities should be ramped up in terms of safety during the period that new-generation nuclear facilities are being developed. As soon as feasible, these facilities should be retired in favor of the fail-safe models.

Furthermore, the government department that would operate the nuclear energy utilities should discuss with NASA the feasibility of operating a nuclear waste, deep-space disposal service. Here again, the “freight” would have to be carried in a fail-safe container. This would be much preferred to burying the nuclear waste three miles beneath the Earth’s surface and waiting for nature to find a way to cast it back to the surface.

The nuclear energy utilities would, in part, function to electrify America’s interstate highways, as well as state local routes. Why?

The United States must move toward electric vehicles as the mainstay of transportation for the citizenry. Travellers would be provided with oases at regular (and predictable) points along a roadway. Here, food and rest options would be available, as is usual today. However, importantly to this suggestion, there would be numerous recharging stations for travelers to use. Each oasis would operate with shops that handled batteries, so that a battery change would be available if needed. Nothing is forever. Also, electric vehicle rental stations would operate at each oasis, so that a rented car could be exchanged for a fresh one.

The federal government should not involve its nuclear energy/electric vehicle program with Ford, General Motors, etc., as they have a vested interest in the combustion engine. If those companies produced an electric vehicle, then they would charge such a high price for them that people would opt for much cheaper models of the combustion engine. The effort to redirect America would fail. The whole program would become a laughing stock.

Therefore, the U.S. government should solicit electric car prototypes from entrepreneurs and provide funding for selected small companies. It should fund at least ten entrepreneurial companies, taking a share interest commensurate with its investment. This is not so radically different from the Obama Administration’s investments in GM, Chrysler, etc., which have been successful investments/turnarounds. The entrepreneurs involved would have the option of “renting-to-own” the start-up companies.

The idea here is not to make the government the “owner of everything” but to function as a “regulator of markets.” There can be no fair market run by banks. They always manipulate markets. Banks only know about debt-packages. They don’t know how to make a well-operating electric engine nor care to learn. Their product is debt. Hence, they look to lend to the biggest and richest companies, which they perceive as the safest.

Congress has the Constitutional authority to regulate commerce. Hence, it can bring commerce under the authority of law. Its usual purpose for doing so is to promote the general welfare of its citizens. Under Article I, Section 8, clause 17 & 18, Congress has exclusive legislation power over the District of Columbia, erected Forts, military bases, dock-yards, and other needful buildings, and other federal territories. With the agreement of the several states of the Union, it has expanded the areas over which it has exclusive or joint jurisdiction.

I believe that the rules that were comprehended in the Constitution in regard to transportation, such as post Roads, have naturally expanded with our American growth internally. Spurring that growth has always been an American imperative. For that reason land-grants to settlers constituted a mutual agreement between the government and the settlers that the settlers would improve the land and the government would protect them. It was a kind of feudal arrangement. Both benefited. However, the government never fully removed itself from its duty to protect the settlers. They, in turn, have sent their sons to fight in its military conflicts with other nations.

In my mind that government course of action still exists, based on other grants to other citizens.

A government money-grant to entrepreneurs seems to me to be in the spirit of the old land-grants. In both cases the object is to improve the economy of the nation by helping certain individuals and groups to improve the technological landscape. Government-owned nuclear energy utilities and a government-financed, new electric engine for cars (and, by extension, other purposes) are two such technological arenas. The oases along roadways that I mentioned are similar to dockyards: one serves the needs of land vehicles and the other serves those of the sea.

One may observe that the several states of the Union would undoubtedly welcome improvements within the states, even if the jurisdiction is joint with the federal government, or even solely federal government jurisdiction.

The problem that has developed in the United States is not “government intrusion” into private enterprise within the economy; it is its unwillingness to participate (and lead) with the “needful legislation” that the burden of government demands it shoulder. It awaits bankers loaning the money required to propel the United States into a new and greater orbit. Of course, timidity induces the caution-racked minds in America from bold action. Private banks and American timidity conspire to cast the American economy back to hunter-gatherers status, gleaning garbage for its bounty.

Naturally, there exists a strong political lobby for atavistic schemes, such as turning America back into a bicycle culture. Alarmingly, the District of Columbia is the premier advocate of bicycles for transportation. Since it is under the exclusive legislation power of Congress, one can immediately see the political problem.

There can be no advancement for America under either Democrat or Republican Party leadership, assuming corruption is not thought of as advancement. They are first and foremost the parties of big banks and big oil. All of America’s big international corporations serve the interests of the debt-mongering crowd. There is a distinction between living richly and creating a strong and vibrant national economy.

The only way to extricate America from its malign leadership is to create a national banking system. It would pay for newly created national assets, such as fail-safe nuclear energy utilities. It would provide the funds for building, improving and maintaining the national infrastructure. It would provide the funds for employed citizens to possess an income-suitable home on a rent-to-own basis, allowing the citizen to take the title incrementally over time. There are many avenues by which the government can lead the way, often in a joint jurisdiction based upon carefully reasoned stipulations.

The key here is that the government has the clear power to issue its own money. It did not have to delegate this power to a private central banking trust. The Department of the Treasury is there for a purpose. The Bureau of Engraving and the Mint is there for a purpose. Neither was conceived as a Stepinandfetchit for the Federal Reserve and its flotilla of great private banks that dominate the American money-creation system.

Additionally, an organization within the Treasury would be charged with monitoring the level of currency within the domestic economy. It would be delegated the power to slide a range of excise taxes between 1% and 5%, depending on the need to remove currency from the total pool. The Office of Accounting and the Budget would be formed to properly categorize assets acquired, constructed or sold by the government.

Since interest and credit are the overseers established by the Federal Reserve latifundia to keep the American peasants in line, they have established fear and uncertainty as the modus operandi of life for the masses. These have existed for many decades under both Democrat and Republican leadership. Neither ever effectively alters this arrangement.

However, as Abraham Lincoln noted in regard to his interest-free Greenbacks issued by the U.S. Treasury, such money was, and would be, the greatest blessing that American citizens ever had in their daily lives. He, of course, was assassinated, and his second issue of Greenbacks sabotaged. Private banking interests play rough.

Yet, by setting up a national banking network that is owned by the government, whereat all U.S. citizens had a checking account (no usury), into which all government money was deposited, and from which all funding of asset acquisition and construction would arise, the general welfare of the American people would be on the road to being assured.

Vigilance would be required to keep the agents of Big Banking from sabotaging the American National Renaissance.

What is needed by our American citizenry is not a “hands off” government, but one that offers leadership and direction under the Constitution. The old land-grant system should give way to a business-grant program for entrepreneurs, especially in business areas that the government believes will be crucial for the future of the country – such as electric cars priced within reach of most citizens. An ignorant devotion to debt-capitalism by cavemen Americans should not divert the United States from its destiny of material progress.

Although America today cannot be described as biblically attentive, or even well-schooled, episodes from the Bible find reinforcement in our times. For example the attack on the rear guard of migrating Israel by Amalek. The Israelite tribes were led at that time by Moses. A fierce battle ensued between the warriors of Israel and the perfidious Amalekite army. As long as Moses’ arms were held high, the Israelite forces prevailed. As the battle was lengthy, Aaron and Joshua were obliged to help Moses keep his arms high. The battle was a borderline draw. The Israelites re-grouped, and the Amalekites withdrew.

The Amalekites were descended from Esau. Esau was referenced in the Bible as “Edom.” The Bible noted that Edom was “Red.” The original homeland of Edom was Mount Seir. The capital of Edom was Petra. After the Israelites were removed in bondage to Assyria and Babylon, the Edomites drifted northward into the Southern Kingdom, where they established themselves. After the return from Babylonian captivity of about 50 thousand Judahites under the leadership of Ezra and Nehemiah, they found a large population of strangers occupying the land. In time the Maccabees gained hegemony for the Judahites. Under John Hyrcanus the Edomites were forcibly converted into their religion. From that time forward Edom was Jewish. By the advent of Jesus (Jahshua) the kingdom and its high priests, including Caiphas, were Edomite in origin.

According to the Bible, the Most High bore an eternal enmity against Edom. Hence, it would not be surprising or unnatural if Edom felt enmity toward the Most High.

Who – and where – are Israel uncontaminated? Consider:

“We have reasonable grounds for regarding the Gimiri, or the Cimmerians, who first appeared in the confines of Assyria and Media in the seventh century B.C., and the Sacae of the Behistun Rock nearly two centuries later, as identical with Israel.”

>Robert Alan Balaicius, UNCOVERING THE MYSTERIES OF YOUR HIDDEN INHERITANCE, page 27, citing J. Bernard Nicklin, in SIGNPOSTS OF HISTORY (1956), page 178, quoting Sir Henry Creswicke Rawlinson

In addition, please consider:

“The Scythians told Herodotus [Bk. IV, par. 5, pp. 93-94]…their nation had been in existence for a thousand years previous to the invasion of Darius. If we date, therefore, a thousand years back from the time of Darius (515 B.C.), we arrive at 1485 B.C., the date of the Exodus [from Egypt], when Israel was founded….These lived on the Gerrhus, a tributary of the present Dniester. Herodotus includes among the Scythian tribes the Getae, who lived on the shores of the Danube, i.e., the Arsareth of Esdras….Those Getae, as Herodotus tells us, believed in their immortality, going after their death to Zalmoxis, which means…the ‘God of Moses.’ So also was the country where the Getae lived named Moesia, for in it lived the ‘people of Moses’ (p.129).”

>Robert Alan Balaicius, UNCOVERING THE MYSTERIES OF YOUR HIDDEN INHERITANCE, p. 35, citing Frederick Haberman, TRACING OUR ANCESTORS (1934).

As a last piece of evidence offered at this time, please consider:

“The Anglo-Saxons, Lowland Scotch, Normans, Danes, Norwegians, Swedes, Germans, Dutch, Belgians, Lombards, and Franks have all sprung from that great fountain of the human race…distinguished by the terms Scythian, German, or Gothic….The…Scythians crossed the Araxes [Aras River], passed out of Asia, and…suddenly appeared in Europe, in the seventh century before the Christian era.”

> Robert Alan Balaicius, UNCOVERING THE MYSTERIES OF YOUR HIDDEN INHERITANCE, page 25, citing Sharon Turner F.A.S., R.A.S.L., HISTORY OF THE ANGLO-SAXONS, (6^TH edition), Phila., Vol.1, pp.79,81

The Bible is the history – for the most part – of the seed of Abraham (“Children of the Promise”) in the Holy Land. This seed of Abraham outside of the Holy Land is not addressed except through prophecy or general allusion.

Yet, we know that within the womb of Rachel were two very different (and warring) natures. This brief description in the Bible was a key End-Time prophecy, suggesting the seed-lines that would be “square-off,” as Israel removed itself from Babylon/Egypt at the time of the Anti-Christ. As this “rebellion” would not be acceptable to the Tikkun olam crowd, the fleeing Israel would be attacked at the rear, as is the custom of the Edomites (now called “Jews”).

Interestingly, the Edomite bloodline included that of the Canaanites, as Esau took two Canaanites for wives. It would be certain that they brought with them many servants. Also, over time, as the vicissitudes of life affecting the Canaanite culture waned painfully, many Canaanites would flee to their half-relatives on Mt. Seir. The Canaanites were notorious for their obsession with sex. Sodom and Gomorrah were, of course, Canaanite cities. “Sodomy” (anal sex) was named for the ancient Canaanite city, which was destroyed by the Most High, as recorded in the Bible.

Is it small wonder that Jewish intellectuals and Freemasons heap scorn on the Bible? It just hits too close to home. [The Southern Jurisdiction of Scottish Rite Freemasonry bears the “aka” of “The Jewish Lodge.”]

When you add terror and torture to the Jewish-Edomite-Canaanite mix, you have the sort of cauldron that would even scare a witch.

Please consider:

“Some years ago, the prominent journalist Russel Warren Howe asked [Menachem] Begin whether he considered himself ‘the father’ of terrorism in the Middle East. Begin answered expansively, ‘No, in the entire world.’”

>Theodore Winston Pike, ISRAEL: OUR DUTY…OUR DILEMMA, page 199, citing The Washington Star, June 15, 1981, column by Georgie Anne Geyer

Well did Mr. Begin correct the interviewer, for the terror inflicted on Tsarist Russia softened it for the “Revolution.” The “Death Trains” run by Bela Kuhn and Tibor Samueli in Hungary provided a glimpse at Jewish terror in action, as hapless Hungarians were killed and flung from the train as it rolled through the countryside.

Today, I believe that the same people – still at war with Israel – have begun inflicting a new type of terror against Israelites who dare to speak the truth in the very face of the Resident Evil.

I have previously written a blog here, as well as elsewhere, on the use of some strange pulse against me. It was only after I stumbled across www.surveillanceissues.com that I came to understand generally what weapons were being used against me. Although they seemed exotic to me, they also provided an answer generally to the things that I was experiencing.

The neurophone, for example, was invented about 1957 by a young scientist named Flanagan. It provided a means by which a “conversation” could be initiated along nerves, such as in the arm, and “heard” by the brain, while no one else nearby could hear any sound at all. It completely by-passed the normal mode of hearing. It does not take much intelligence to perceive that advances and refinements have occurred over the last fifty years. This is especially true when one realizes that military intelligence and government intelligence agencies have primarily exhibited interest in such “weaponry.”

Also, computers have been developed with software refinements that can speak human thoughts and language, based on known electromagnetic characteristics. By now these dedicated computers must have a “vocabulary” larger by far than most educated Americans. These computers can utilize orbiting satellites. They speak many languages. In a site such as NSA, where large numbers of huge computers exist, it may be possible to communicate with millions of people simultaneously. In each such case the conversation would be perceived only by the target. An army of Manchurian Candidates can be grown amid the general population with no one else aware.

However, it is the use of electromagnetic and acoustical pulses that have reached priority status with me.

Everyone has a unique electromagnetic field. This field can be identified, computerized and reached at any time by satellites dedicated to such a program. Once catalogued, wherever the target goes, he can be “attacked” by calibrated levels of pulse waves. Over time, any part of the human electromagnetic field can be singled out for intense pulse wave attack. The attacks - from my personal experiences – build at the site attacked. This suggested to me that they may be “turned on,” or they may be programmed to intermittently attack during the day. However it is done, it does seem to go from an unperceived state to a very palpable presence.

Because I became most aware of these strange “pulses” at my three last residences, I assumed that the required identification of my personal electromagnetic field was taking place during these stays. I assume that accuracy in identifying my field grew with each sojourn, and that by my last move into a new residence, I had allowed unwittingly my complete electromagnetic identification by the unknown agents of terror and torture. These were computerized and “saved.” Or it may have been merely that approval had to be attained for the “experiment” to continue as a terror/torture event. After all, even in the matters of terror and torture, the DIA and CIA still are bureaucracies.

Now, the attacks on me are daily events. This fact, however, is not viewed as credible by the general population, who, having no ideas, cannot imagine “such a thing.” For me it is quite real.

The attacks on me divide into two general sorts. The first is a low-level, constant pulse wave, which generally occurs throughout my efforts at sleep. These are head-to-toe assaults, emphasizing somewhat the lower back/buttock and head areas. The second type of pulse wave assault is very palpable. It is concentrated on the tailbone or one of the hip joints. These create a “boring” sensation that can be painful and always distracting.

There is another type of attack that is not of the same nature, apparently. A tickling sensation can be created on the skin and within the nostrils. This can be distracting, as anyone can easily imagine. Upon hearing this many might think it was funny and “not so bad.” However, the “Chinese Water Torture” would not seem to be any kind of torture at all to many. It is the experiencing of the event that assured that it was properly labeled “torture.”

The arguably worst form of attack involves some sort of electromagnetic or acoustical attack on the sphincter muscle at the anus. Sometimes the attack is calibrated to cause tickling sensations, and at other times, it seems to be an effort at forcible sodomy.

This last form of assault helped narrow down the source of the attacks on me as – on high probability – Israeli/ADL personnel, working with F.B.I. or C.I.A. agents. Both American intelligence groups have many hackers and other “acquaintances” to commit “dirty tricks.” The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (“ADL”) has a long commitment to stifling views they opposed, spying, collecting dossiers and dirty tricks. In the electronic era the ADL has moved fully into high-tech weapons of stifling, spying, dirty tricks, etc. Being an unregistered agent of the Israelis, they would have available almost any weapon developed by the D.I.A. OR C.I.A. Further, they seem to work with another Jewish-led spy outfit, The Southern Poverty Law Center.

The last organization is led by M. Seligman Dees. He is reputed to like to “tease homosexuals” by suggesting that he is one also. His wife divorced him, stating in part that Dees took her to Washington, D.C. for their 10^th wedding anniversary and forced her to watch him sodomize a young man employed by the National Endowment For The Arts (or some similar outfit).

It looks as if M. Seligman Dees cannot restrain the perverted energies of his inheritance.

Although I freely admit that scenarios might be created that suggested that the assaults on me arose from disturbed minds in the Pentagon/D.I.A. or in the C.I.A./Washington Post or in the Justice Department/O.S.I./F.B.I., I believe that the Israeli/Zionist/ADL line makes the most sense. Why?

I have been one of the most persistent voices stating the clear fact that the “Holocaust” is a fraud and monstrous, massive crime. It is because this scam is so important to the Zionists to provide the Israeli state with “social security” payments from the Germans (and possibly one day all Christians), its denial is unacceptable.

Not only that, the deranged religious conceits of the Israelis/Zionists include the postulation that the Jews are the collective messiah. The messianic age will arrive when Tikkun olam (“repair of the world”) has been accomplished. Hence, the “Holocaust” has also been fashioned as a suitable substitute for Jesus (Jahshua) for perceptive Christians, who would see that the Jews “died” during WW2 but miraculously “resurrected.” They – not Jesus – are the true messiah.

The “Holocaust” is so brimming with fraud, deceit, idolatry, plunder and rapine that no moral person can affirm it. However, in the era of the “great falling away” there aren’t so many for the Resident Evil to worry about.

Nevertheless, the Jewish “repair of the world” will mean the slaughter of the innocent not witnessed since the days of Herod, the Jewish-Edomite king of Judea.

I feel honored to bear the Cross.