You are viewing mensched4time

SINGULARITIES AND IDENTIFICATIONS


I often hear news first, rather than see it. I spend much of my day driving. For that reason I tune in the “weather & traffic” station of my choice, which also carries news summaries, sports and the inevitable gaggle of experts and commentators. The station would probably be characterized by people who make it their business to label news outlets as “liberal.”

A couple of days ago, they featured in a sort of “breaking news” style the shootings in Kansas on or about a couple of Jewish facilities. According to the news report, two or three people had been shot and at least two were killed. One was reported to be a boy and the other an older man. The shooter had been apprehended alive and taken into custody by authorities.

The radio station report was presented in such a way as to emphasize the “Jewish” facilities, suggesting that the people who were shot were Jewish. Further, the shooter was identified as one Frazier Glenn Miller, who was identified as a known anti-Semite. He had also, according to this report, an alias, “Frazier Glenn Cross, Jr.” According to the radio report, he had a long association with the KKK.

Most of the news information about the shooter had been provided by the Southern Poverty Law Center [“SPLC”], originally founded by Mr. Morris Seligman Dees, Jr. and Joe Levin. Its first president was Julian Bond. Mr. Dees had previously operated a mail-order business in Alabama which he had been able to sell to a Chicago group for a surprisingly generous price. The funds gained in this sale provided the funds for Mr. Dees to finance the creation of the SPLC. Mr. Dees is Jewish in origins.

Parenthetically, the SPLC has operated a secular intelligence, spying and – some say – a “dirty tricks” operation in the guise of a benevolent organization. It works closely with the FBI, Homeland Security, and other federal organizations to record, store, analyze and publish information on “hate crimes.” The major media usually report the findings of the SPLC. “Hate crimes” have typically been crimes against Jews, African Americans, homosexuals, Latinos, et al, perpetrated by “white people.”

For the above reasons I was not surprised that the radio station reports emphasized buzzwords and phrases such as “hate,” “anti-Semitic,””racist,” et cetera. Also, the sites of the shooting were emphasized. The name reported on the radio of the shooter was repeated, along with mention of the aka “Cross.” They had the SPLC data taken from their large collection of dossiers to identify the shooter more fully.

One felt to shake one’s head at the insane violence.

However, since there were follow-up reports also provided by the radio station of record over the next 36 hours, I began to notice some differences in texture. The people killed were not identified as Jews. Emphasis on the Jewish facility continued along with lamentations about the period in which the killings occurred. Denunciations about “hate” were voiced often.

Then there a report that clearly suggested that the victims weren’t Jewish. Since my initial assumption from the news was that the shooter hated Jews and had gone to the Jewish facilities to specifically kill Jews, I thought of the dread irony he unleashed. While not wishing any injury to Jews, I could not help thinking, ”What an idiot! He wanted kill Jews and, in fact, killed non-Jews.”

With this mood in my mind, I renewed my own analysis of the situation and motivation which created it.

The shooter was 73 years old. Was it possible that he had heard “bad news” from a doctor that made him desperate to accomplish such a horrible deed? Did he want to make “a statement” to America and the world?

I knew from my own experience that many Jews bear the last name “Miller.” Was it possible that Frazier Glenn Miller was himself Jewish in origins? I had read some years back of a man named “Collins” who headed a Neo-Nazi outfit near Chicago, Illinois. He was exposed as a Jew. There have been other such singularities.

To offer some support to my allegations about the name “Miller,” I googled the term “Rabbi Miller” and easily copied a few examples from what must undoubtedly be a large pool of such names. Consider:

1. Rabbi Mark J. Miller – Associate Rabbi. Rabbi Mark J. Miller grew up in Colorado

2. Senior Rabbi Mark S. Miller

3. Rabbi Avigdor Miller

4. Rabbi Jason Miller, West Bloomfield Township, Michigan

5. Rabbi Bennett F. Miller - Anshe Emeth Memorial Temple

6. RABBI Tamara Miller

7. Rabbi Nisson Dov Miller - Etz Chaim Sharon

8. Rabbi Yisroel Miller - House Of Jacob Mikveh Israel

9. Rabbi Yitzhak Miller is an experienced rabbi of the Reform Jewish movement

10. Rabbi Shmuel Miller, founder of Midrasho Shel Shem.

As you can see, the name “Miller” is a common Jewish name. The shooter may or may not be a Jew. However, no one ever suggested that the shooter was a Jew. Presumably, reliance on the SPLC is absolute at the level of federal police organizations and the major media.

Why would a Jew perpetrate such a horrible act against Jews?

Only weeks before this shooting in Kansas, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith [“ADL”] had been warning Jewish congregations and organizations to be on alert for possible violence. Therefore, within the Jewish community there must have been heightened awareness of danger.

Organizations such as the SPLC and ADL have been alleged to have infiltrated “far-rightwing” organizations, aka, “extremist” organizations for many years. Their value to FBI and other federal police/intelligence organizations was born of this sort of work. Could Frazier Glenn Miller be such an undercover spy? Was that why he used the name “Cross?” There are still Jews who hate the “man on the cross” and might use his name in spite.

With these speculations in mind consider Frazier Glenn Miller. He must be brave if he infiltrated such a notoriously dangerous group as the KKK. If he also learned from his doctor that he had only a few months to live, then he might have been moved to that state of mind where violence is easily entertained. If a Jew, he would not be interested in hurting Jews. He would, however, given the nature of the ADL and the SPLC, have felt “his people” were threatened by an anti-Semitic world.

Therefore, he may have decided to kill the “enemies” of Jews, while at the same time reinforcing the image of the persecuted Jews. He would go to a Jewish facility where non-Jews were known to be, and his dread beau geste for his people would also be a kind of “swan song” for a man already dying. He would kill – but not Jews. He would die as a vile man. The KKK organization he joined would reap the enmity for his deed.

Insanity?

To paraphrase Lord Byron: Truth is stranger than fiction.

Post Script:

I saw today where the shooter had been born “Frazier Glenn Cross, Jr.” Yet, given the initial information reported on the radio, no one even thought to look more broadly at this violence. That is odd, as it was centered in a realm of “false flags” and misinformation meant to achieve an approved consensus.


THE IMPORTANCE OF BEING "YELLEN"


I've been driving and listening to the radio today (January 06, 2014). One of the subjects of interest for them as been the appointment of Ms. Yellen to head he Federal Reserve. She will replace the retiring Mr. Ben Bernanke. According to the radio pundits, her significance rests upon the fact that she is a woman. She is the first to head the Federal Reserve. I disagree with the radio pundits. They may suppose that women have "differently wired" brains, as some claim. However, I believe that she is a trained economist. Although there may be theoretic variations among economists, it is not likely that anyone seated on the Federal Reserve - or working as a staff person - would be there if they were radical "boat-rockers." The Fed Is a private, as opposed to government, banking organization. It understands who it must first serve and protect. In this sense she is a typical nomination. As with Bernanke, Greenspan, and Volker, she is a Jew. Ms.Yellen's appointment is therefore a rather pedestrian event.

BARACK AGAINST SYRIA


Bashar el-Assad - C1

Bashar el-Assad - C1

I don't believe that it is reasonable to assert that the Syrian regime has used toxic gas on its citizens nor on the rebels which they have been fighting. In the first instance they have been winning the fight against their opponents, using conventional weapons. In the second instance, they have an interest in not drawing the United States into the conflict on the side of their enemies. In the third instance they have war-materiel support from Russia which might well end if they used toxic gas at this point in the conflict. Why risk it?

Further, the fairly standard Anglo-American psywar gambits are being manifested. Reports of atrocities against women and children have been recently spun. Illegal, immoral weaponry have been reported by intelligence operatives. These weapons have been depicted as a threat to America and the world. On a high probability “evidence” has been planted by Anglo-American and Israeli intelligence agents, as was done in WW II.

Furthermore, the American intelligence agencies – both DoD and CIA – have the ability to synthesize credible audio through captured sound waves that have been captured to computer, analyzed and reproduced. Computers in the NSA and DoD “darkoperations” can “talk” to anyone in any language from orbiting satellites and remote land locations using electromagnetic waves aimed at the electromagnetic field unique to each human.

Simple consideration of the special effects capabilities of Hollywood filmmakers should cause any American to pause.

It is well to recall the words of Irish poet William Butler Yeats:

“Politicians are easy men, they tell their lies by rote;

Journalists make up their own and grab you by the throat.”

Caveat: My blog creation has been actively interfered with by hackers - probably hired by a government agency - to thwart and stifle my efforts at expressing myself well. When you cannot defeat an argument, you try to make it invisible or impaired.

SIX MILLION JEWS 1915-1938 HD


PRESIDENT OBAMA & THE U.S. MIDDLE CLASS


BObama-C4

Especially during President Obama's 2nd term of office, he seemed to affirm a special concern for the American middle class. He almost seemed to carve out a political position of “patron” of the American middle class. Was – and is – this credible? Was he employing special terminology, as good lawyers often do? Has he become a student of derashic sages?

Given Barack Obama’s long years of nursing at the dugs of devotees of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin and subsequently imbibing from the enriched milk of Antonio Gramsci, could he have flip-flopped his sympathies from the proletariat/workers/downtrodden classes to the American middle class? I don’t think that is likely.

For Marxists the bourgeoisie was always a stage of economic development that must yield in the name of progress to people’s equality. The bourgeoisie was like an outer rampart that had to be scaled so that the social imperative could confront and defeat capitalism itself. The French term “bourgeoisie” can be translated to mean “middle class.”

If President Obama was a Marxist, he would certainly oppose the middle class. Since he has been associated with Marxism and socialism in several important ways, such as parents, relatives, friends, mentors, and organizations, his adherence to its tenets would seem firmly set. One cannot help but to believe that his heart remained with the community of poor and “exploited” and not with a category composed of wannabe exploiters.

The fact that middle class folks didn’t see themselves as exploiters was irrelevant. How President Obama viewed them was the issue.

I am certain that the American middle class is dissolving. The only place that they can go is down. With the capitalists no longer in a position of playing the middle class off against the masses of underemployed, the stage will be set for the great battle of capitalists and their machinery vs. the exploited masses. Hence, it may play out in a MATRIX-like story.

The American middle class is hopelessly positioned in a usury economy of debt-mongering. Capitalist banks routinely inflate-deflate the credit they have issued, while perversely blaming the middle class for not saving enough and at the same time not spending enough. Only the American middle class has found virtue in this system: 1) they have been pleased to “pull in their belts” and 2) they have gotten a renewal of pride in showing “how tough they were as they got their ass kicked.”

Their preachers have never inveighed against usury. They have never advised them that a “beggar one’s neighbor” approach won’t appear so appealing when one became “the neighbor.”

The slow grounding up of the middle class provided food for the restless masses slowly turning to the revolution as a flower to the sun. Was it not reasonable that President Obama’s concern for the American middle class was, in fact, similar to Dr. Kevorkian’s concern for the living doomed?

Regardless of the huffing and puffing of conservative spokespeople, an Obama-esque change will and must come to America due to the very central contradictions that have been built into the system. Allowing private banks (and even corporations) to create the great bulk of the national money supply defied all the “checks and balances” carefully introduced into the organic law of the land by the Founding Fathers. By the early 20th Century risk capital, created out of thin air, increasingly powered the economy. Periodic collapses had become certain. Iconic areas of the modern American system, according to conservative/Republican thinking, such as international central banks, free trade, and mobile (underpaid) work force, provoked terminal illness in Uncle Sam.

The idea of the interconnectivity of a global economy diminished national concerns as “parochial,” while simultaneously severing the relationship of American citizens to the controlling strings of power. The U. S. citizens were advised to “think globally and act locally.” However, their thinking had become almost entirely based on hearsay and dubious video footage. Hence, they could not possibly cogently “act globally” (assuming their elected representatives actually represented their views), forcing them in the end to leave matters to unelected “experts.”

Bigness defied representative government. It encouraged not citizen rule but syndicate rule.

President Obama presumably hopes that after the death of Uncle Sam, he may be revitalized as Comrade Sam. Then he can take his politically correct seat at the table with the other syndicate hoodlums. The era of the dictatorship of the people of the world community will be at hand. Each American can proudly boast, “And I helped!” However, they will have no influence on significant future decisions. Nevertheless, they may take pride in helping select who will play on the All-Star team in local sport.

THE ORIGIN OF ILLUSTRATIVE ART


FRENCH CAVE-DRAWINGS

The origin of Art can be discovered by reflecting upon the life and times of cavemen. Although all Art may find a common origin in my proposition,
I am herein concentrating on illustrative Art. Therefore, consider the cavemen of France.

Cave wall-paintings in southern France have been recorded for many years, and they have been assigned to the “genius” of either Cro-Magnon and/or Neanderthal Man. Let us, therefore, focus on the elder of the two categories so that our proposition may touch upon its earliest option.

What, then, was the basic occupation of the Neanderthal Man?

They were undoubtedly hunters. Of course, all men are opportunistic when it comes to food. None would turn up his nose at a sudden spread of wild berries temptingly ripe on the branch or vine. However, Modern Man conceives of Neanderthals surrounding some hapless beast – possibly an ungulate – and stabbing and beating the creature into their shopping cart.

What then?

Hey! It’s a jungle out there!

They take the dinner-to-be home to their favorite cave, where they promptly “rub-up” a fire. Once the cave fire is blazing, they toss their game onto it.

Originally, it seems unlikely that they would skin, gut and clean the fallen beast. Practice makes perfect, ‘tis said. However, for my purpose the development of the cavemen to rudimentary chefs seems likely. Just the other day, I was watching “Chopped” on The Food Channel. In regard to the preparation at hand by one of the contesting chefs, a judging chef stated that he liked his meat rare – still with fur. Hyperbole for effect? Possibly. Yet this judging chef did look a bit like a Neanderthal to me.

Be that as it may, my proposition demanded that the cave cooking of Neanderthal Man develop and improve over time. When the necessary and sufficient skill at cooking finally developed, then the Neanderthal family groups would sit around their camp fires – quietly burping and smacking their lips. Furthermore, a certain expectation regarding the taste of dinner should have been developed by these cave-dwellers.

If my proposition should hold through the testing process of critics, it would inexorably lead to the following scenario:

Neanderthal Man number one had not participated in the day’s hunt. Perhaps he had “turf-toe.” Nor did he participate in the gutting and cleaning of the beast du jour. However, family bonds assured that he would have a share of the cooked game. Let us call Neanderthal Man number one – “Ogwog.”

Now, the family hunting leader and “tosser of food on the flames” – Neanderthal Man number two – will be called “Drawog.”

Envision the family before the camp fire, eagerly eating portions of the beast. There would be the customary burps and smacking of the lips, expressing approval.

Ogwog looked up and said, “This meat is tasty! I’ve never tasted this before. It’s great!”

Drawog would reply, “It is a boogielope.”

A puzzled Ogwog would then respond, “Boogielope? I am not familiar with a boogielope.”

Drawog would then reply, “They live in woods and are hard to see. They are very fast, too.”

A curious Ogwog would ask, “Then how did you catch it?”

Replied Drawog, “We found him lying on the ground; his leg was broken. We naturally put him out of his misery and dumped him in our shopping cart.”

Interested in this strange beast, Ogwog would then ask Drawog what the boogielope looked like, as he strained to recall such a beast.

Drawog would then pause, wondering how to describe the boogielope. As he stared at his feet, he noticed a charred piece of wood at the fire’s edge.

Then the cultural “quantum leap” occurred. Drawog would pick up the charred stick, arise and go to the nearest cave wall, which was reasonably well-lighted by the flame. He would pause before the wall as he concentrated his memory on the beast, as well as the glimpses of boogielopes he had experienced in the past. Then he would draw with the point of the charred wood.

When Drawog had completed his illustration, he would double-check it for accuracy. Then he would say to Ogwog, “The boogielope look like dis.”

From this portentous moment Neanderthal Man began to regularly describe what they had hunted and eaten. Hierarchies of deliciousness were developed by the placement of illustrations. The cave drawings were actually the first illustrated menu. Bon appetit!

From this humble beginning, all Art developed, including music. It is not my intention to show how music developed from cave menus at this time, which will have to await another time.

THE ORIGIN OF ART

The origin of Art can be discovered by reflecting upon the life and times of cavemen. Although all Art may find a common origin in my proposition,
I am herein concentrating on illustrative Art. Therefore, consider the cavemen of France.

Cave wall-paintings in southern France have been recorded for many years, and they have been assigned to the “genius” of either Cro-Magnon and/or Neanderthal Man. Let us, therefore, focus on the elder of the two categories so that our proposition may touch upon its earliest option.

What, then, was the basic occupation of the Neanderthal Man?

They were undoubtedly hunters. Of course, all men are opportunistic when it comes to food. None would turn up his nose at a sudden spread of wild berries temptingly ripe on the branch or vine. However, Modern Man conceives of Neanderthals surrounding some hapless beast – possibly an ungulate – and stabbing and beating the creature into their shopping cart.

What then?

Hey! It’s a jungle out there!

They take the dinner-to-be home to their favorite cave, where they promptly “rub-up” a fire. Once the cave fire is blazing, they toss their game onto it.

Originally, it seems unlikely that they would skin, gut and clean the fallen beast. Practice makes perfect, ‘tis said. However, for my purpose the development of the cavemen to rudimentary chefs seems likely. Just the other day, I was watching “Chopped” on The Food Channel. In regard to the preparation at hand by one of the contesting chefs, a judging chef stated that he liked his meat rare – still with fur. Hyperbole for effect? Possibly. Yet this judging chef did look a bit like a Neanderthal to me.

Be that as it may, my proposition demanded that the cave cooking of Neanderthal Man develop and improve over time. When the necessary and sufficient skill at cooking finally developed, then the Neanderthal family groups would sit around their camp fires – quietly burping and smacking their lips. Furthermore, a certain expectation regarding the taste of dinner should have been developed by these cave-dwellers.

If my proposition should hold through the testing process of critics, it would inexorably lead to the following scenario:

Neanderthal Man number one had not participated in the day’s hunt. Perhaps he had “turf-toe.” Nor did he participate in the gutting and cleaning of the beast du jour. However, family bonds assured that he would have a share of the cooked game. Let us call Neanderthal Man number one – “Ogwog.”

Now, the family hunting leader and “tosser of food on the flames” – Neanderthal Man number two – will be called “Drawog.”

Envision the family before the camp fire, eagerly eating portions of the beast. There would be the customary burps and smacking of the lips, expressing approval.

Ogwog looked up and said, “This meat is tasty! I’ve never tasted this before. It’s great!”

Drawog would reply, “It is a boogielope.”

A puzzled Ogwog would then respond, “Boogielope? I am not familiar with a boogielope.”

Drawog would then reply, “They live in woods and are hard to see. They are very fast, too.”

A curious Ogwog would ask, “Then how did you catch it?”

Replied Drawog, “We found him lying on the ground; his leg was broken. We naturally put him out of his misery and dumped him in our shopping cart.”

Interested in this strange beast, Ogwog would then ask Drawog what the boogielope looked like, as he strained to recall such a beast.

Drawog would then pause, wondering how to describe the boogielope. As he stared at his feet, he noticed a charred piece of wood at the fire’s edge.

Then the cultural “quantum leap” occurred. Drawog would pick up the charred stick, arise and go to the nearest cave wall, which was reasonably well-lighted by the flame. He would pause before the wall as he concentrated his memory on the beast, as well as the glimpses of boogielopes he had experienced in the past. Then he would draw with the point of the charred wood.

When Drawog had completed his illustration, he would double-check it for accuracy. Then he would say to Ogwog, “The boogielope look like dis.”

From this portentous moment Neanderthal Man began to regularly describe what they had hunted and eaten. Hierarchies of deliciousness were developed by the placement of illustrations. The cave drawings were actually the first illustrated menu. Bon appetit!

From this humble beginning, all Art developed, including music. It is not my intention to show how music developed from cave menus at this time, which will have to await another time.

DROPPING "BIBI"


DROPPING “BIBI”

When I watched the debate between Veep Biden and Candidate Veep Ryan on television, I thought the former was mildly patronizing at several points. The debate became both fascinating and ludicrous at the same time, when the subject turned to foreign afffairs.

Both men tried to flex their muscles, especially on the issues involving Iran. Clearly, both sides of the argument depended heavily on the “spin doctors” of Israeli intelligence to gauge the Iranian threat. Still, Veep Biden was obliged to follow the economic pressure route “blazed” by President Obama, while wannabe veep Ryan was free to pursue the Romney nuclear-bomb-rattling route.

However, both Biden and Ryan made a point of dropping the familiar name of “BiBi” (Benjamin Netanyahu) several times during a period of only several minutes at most. To be on a first-name basis – and nickname at that – of the leader of the Likud Party and head of the Israeli state meant a lot of political points with many of richest donors to the two major American political parties.

The calculated insertion of the name “BiBi” by both candidates probably told perceptive viewers more about the candidates than any other assertion either may have attempted during this debate. In times of trouble little men flatter big men; not the other way around.

Personally, I’m not an Israel-Firster. I’m an America-Firster. Hence, my instinct is to look to my own country for a strong leader. Most Americans have been indoctrinated to suppose that that point of view is Fascist – even Nazi politics. To me it is common sense.

Fortunately for the Democrat and Republican candidates (for anything), common sense is as scarce in America as great rivers are in the Israeli state.

The American people are hooked on the illusion of America sprayed upon the screens and tubes of their workaday world. They have become “daydream believers and homecoming queens.”

Can you say “BiBi?”

Netanyahu-C2

When I watched the debate between Veep Biden and Candidate Veep Ryan on television, I thought the former was mildly patronizing at several points. The debate became both fascinating and ludicrous at the same time, when the subject turned to foreign afffairs.

Both men tried to flex their muscles, especially on the issues involving Iran. Clearly, both sides of the argument depended heavily on the “spin doctors” of Israeli intelligence to gauge the Iranian threat. Still, Veep Biden was obliged to follow the economic pressure route “blazed” by President Obama, while wannabe veep Ryan was free to pursue the Romney nuclear-bomb-rattling route.

However, both Biden and Ryan made a point of dropping the familiar name of “BiBi” (Benjamin Netanyahu) several times during a period of only several minutes at most. To be on a first-name basis – and nickname at that – of the leader of the Likud Party and head of the Israeli state meant a lot of political points with many of richest donors to the two major American political parties.

The calculated insertion of the name “BiBi” by both candidates probably told perceptive viewers more about the candidates than any other assertion either may have attempted during this debate. In times of trouble little men flatter big men; not the other way around.

Personally, I’m not an Israel-Firster. I’m an America-Firster. Hence, my instinct is to look to my own country for a strong leader. Most Americans have been indoctrinated to suppose that that point of view is Fascist – even Nazi politics. To me it is common sense.

Fortunately for the Democrat and Republican candidates (for anything), common sense is as scarce in America as great rivers are in the Israeli state.

The American people are hooked on the illusion of America sprayed upon the screens and tubes of their workaday world. They have become “daydream believers and homecoming queens.”

Can you say “BiBi?”

ADAM GADAHN AND TERRORISM


I wasGadahn riding along in my van and listening to the radio yesterday (09/25/12) when the station's "expert" reporter on intelligence matters once again provided a breathless report on Arab terrorists. This time he spoke about a message that was said to have been the work of one "Adam Gadahn." This individual had been reported on other occasions, although not recently, as far as my personal knowledge goes.


Parenthetically, this station once was owned by The Washington Post and has been owned by a Mormon-controlled outfit of late. It has a liberal, pro-Israel news perspective, although proclaiming that it provides news from all sides. The radio talent is disproportionately Jewish, which is a common phenomenon in world, national and cosmopolitan news outlets in American-based media companies. It's not limited to a few radio stations.

Therefore, my radio station of record is a regular source of intriguing information. Had this Monday been April 1, I would have slapped my knee at the "obvious disinformation" being parcelled out. Since that wasn't the case, I had to wonder about the ramifications of the report presented by the intelligence expert. [He generally repeats assertions that prominent figures in the intelligence area in American and Israeli government(s) provide.]

The name "Adam Gadahn" was familiar to me because Texe Marrs had reported in his bulletin that two Jews were masquerading as Arab terrorists (or extremists). Apparently, Adam Gadahn was a close relative of Carl K. Pearlman of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith. He grew up in California.

The other Jew was named Cohen (or Coen) and was a former NYC taxi driver. He used the Arab name "Yousef al-Khattab" and was making extremist speeches favoring the murderers of Daniel Pearl and the Arab major at Fort Hood, Texas.

What gives? If Texe Marrs can discover such things, so can news reporters in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. These intelligent and sophisticated "newshounds" talk to one another. How can they not know?

Continuing, the radio intelligence reporter advised the listening audience that "Adam Gadahn" was now believed to be among the top leaders in al Qaeda!

Many conspiracy theorists have guessed that it was possible that al Qaeda was - at the top - an agent of the C.I.A. and/or the Mossad. The fact that George H. W. Bush had headed the C.I.A. at one time, as well as having had a friendly relationship, including oil and other businesses, with the rich Saudi Arabian family, the bin Ladens (of which Osama bin Laden was one), suggested the possibility of the C.I.A. setting up a controlled Arab terrorist movement in the form of "al Qaeda." Since the New World Order was a concept that George H.W. Bush publicly urged as a "big idea" for Americans, the actual impel to create such an order might be "another Pearl Harbor." By controlling both sides of the equation, the mathematics looked good for quantum-leaping the U.S.A. and the world into such an order.

Whatever the theorizing one might feel compelled to test, the practical matter is that American and Israeli Jews appear to be participating in Arab extremism. Further, some appear to be working in Arab terror organizations in leadership positions. Therefore, one may well wonder if most of the worst elements of Arab and Muslim terrorist organizations aren't, in fact, Jews in disguise. The mass of their followers are poorly educated, excluding the Qaran, but are filled with ardor for the dignity of their faith. The impressionable among them would be particularly ripe for manipulation, such as suicide bombings.

Since the American media can be counted on to not report anything that might embarrass Israel or the American ruling elite (Rockefellers, et al), only the responsible voices of the lesser media, such as Texe Marrs, beam rays of light on these dark matters.Al-Khattab-Cohen-Ed.

THE FRENCH CAVE-DRAWING CONTROVERSY


There was a secret wall image in a cave in France that both French authorities and evolutionary theorists want to deny. The image appeared in a section of the cave system known as Bernifal Cave. I use past tense because the section of the cave at which the image appeared was closed to the public. The evidence provided by this image is so damaging to the proponents of established historical timelines and “Ages” that it may, indeed, have been annihilated by its French custodians.

I have provided a photograph of the image that appeared in Mr. Jack Cuozzo’s fascinating account of his study of Neanderthal facial remnants, especially teeth, that he entitled BURIED ALIVE!. Most of the book focused on the French specimens and the French caves in which specimen and artifacts, including “wall painting,” were discovered. I have also included an image of my paperback version’s cover, less anyone doubt its existence.

What did the wall image depict? It depicted a confrontation between a dinosaur and a mammoth.

Who is or was Jack Cuozzo that you should allocate time to this matter? Dr. Jack Cuozzo studied at Georgetown University and obtained degrees from the University of Pennsylvania (D.D.S.) and Loyola University/Chicago Graduate School of Dentistry. His specialty is Orthodontics. He has had a life-long interest in Neanderthal man.

Those familiar with these matters understand that timelines forbid any confrontation between a dinosaur and a mammoth, as dinosaurs died out some 62 million years before the mammoths roamed the Earth. Hence, the existence of a cave image depicting such confrontation cannot exist. The only conclusion that establishment authorities can reach is that any image depicting a confrontation between dinosaur and mammoth on a Bernifal Cave wall cannot be depicting such a confrontation, since it was an established fact that dinosaurs did not exist at the time of mammoths.

The sealing of the cave from further public scrutiny is the desperate act of an imprisoned class of authorities. Dr. Cuozzo stated in his book that it was likely that the French cave authorities removed this unwanted piece of evidence. Further, he attempted to interest American authorities and journals, which specialized in this area, in his photographs, speculations and conclusions without success.

The problem faced by Dr. Cuozzo was one faced by many other mavericks of science, such as Copernicus, Pasteur, et al, of massive resistance by period authorities.

The “Age of Dinosaurs” is typically presented as if the various Saurischia and Ornithischia were the only game in town. Yet, there were mammals that lived simultaneously with the dinosaurs during at least a portion of the timeline allocated to dinosaurs by experts. Although the theory of utter dinosaur annihilation has been argued as established, the various proposals that touch upon the means of its annihilation have rung hollow. If dinosaurs were destroyed by an ice-age brought on by some disaster, why would mammals not also perish? Not all dinosaurs were giants; some were the size of birds.

Further, why would the relatives of modern reptiles survive? True, they could abide in water for a while. Fresh water reptiles would seemingly be as doomed as dinosaurs. Salt-water reptiles, being cold-blooded, might find the sea water inhospitable in a big freeze of the hypothesized sort. Whether cold-blooded or warm-blooded, dinosaur-era precursors of modern reptiles would find food scarce. Additionally, the salt seas hosted ferocious fish, apparently.

The subsequent “Cambrian Explosion” is inexplicable, so it is presented theoretically as an event in which a godlike Mother Nature declared, “Life! Find a way!” (And it did.)

The established position is that Cro-Magnon Man actually did the cave paintings; Neanderthals were thought to have passed from the Earthly scene. Some experts suggest that the two primates existed in hostile clans during a sort of “overlap” era. Dr. Cuozzo challenged the distinction.

In the Neanderthal Age mammals might have dominated the Earth. Yet, there were certainly reptiles in all temperate and tropical zones. They might be lowly snakes and lizards, but they were present along with the giant mammoths. Could not this objective situation have inspired a reverse scenario in which the reptiles were dominating giants and mammals laying low to the ground? Where do theories come from? I believe that “sleight of hand” may be used in a pinch.

As pointed out by Dr. Cuozzo, there were portable cultural artifacts that were carried by Neanderthal clans [See Marshak, Roots of Civilization, La Madeleine artifacts]. He reasonably pointed out that some of them may well have been passed down for generations. On some of them have been carved snake images. Why would not images of snakes appear on the walls of the caves in France in which Neanderthal clans were said to have dwelled? [Being nomadic hunters, they might have established cave “cottages” in several locations adjacent to the usual roaming range of preferred game.] Although the Neanderthal rendered images of what he hunted, he also rendered images of what he saw. Snake images are one of the most persistent images found in antiquity.

Dr. Cuozzo found cave guides exclusively discussing mammals, as if no other animal family existed. He stated that all French authorities in this area of interest did the same. Tourists were shown images of bison, mammoth, elk, and the like. Apparently, no tourist ever thought to ask, “Where are the reptiles?”

His examination of the Bernifal Cave was, of course, different. Dr. Cuozzo’s knowledge of Bernifal Cave was provided in a guide book he had brought with him in which one Ann Sieveking described it as the only important cave in a certain section of southern France. She stated that it was open to the public. [Apparently, it was open to the public between 1976 and 1979.] Perhaps ominously, Michelin map entirely ignored Bernifal Cave. Ms. Sieveking had warned that a visitor would have to bring his own light, as the cave was unlit.

Dr. Cuozzo noted that an unlit public cave would not be a strong tourist draw. He inferred official discouragement and wondered what was in the cave.

Taking his wife and five children with him, Dr. Cuozzo ventured forth into rural France. He did not know the precise location of the cave. He probably hoped for guiding signs. Eventually, he and his “team” set forth on foot toward a farmhouse beyond which they hoped to find the cave entrance. They ignored warning signs.

The entrance to the cave had been blocked by sturdy wooden doors, which someone had broken through in the middle. The Cuozzo team entered. It was very dark, had a slippery floor and was 50 degrees F. They had four flashlights among them. Cautiously, they proceeded into it.

He snapped photographs of its walls as he proceeded. Later, while examining the photographs, he discovered the interesting image of the dinosaur-mammoth confrontation. He speculated that a Neanderthal had actually witnessed such a confrontation and rendered it on the wall. There was also the possibility that it was witnessed by an ancestral Neanderthal who rendered the scene to his clan, as it was undoubtedly a memorable fuss. Thereafter, the image passed down through the clan.

Dr. Cuozzo learned soon after his tour of the Bernifal Cave, the section in which he had photographed the dinosaur-mammoth confrontation had been sealed off from the public for some time.

Further, as Dr. Cuozzo’s stay in France progressed and the nature of his work more fully appreciated by authorities, he discovered that he was being followed by French police/intelligence. [This whole story would make a great movie.]

In regard to the cave paintings by Neanderthals this famous series of caves offered the French government a significant tourist draw. The established timeline could not be tampered with without calling into question all sorts of historical issues which authorities had considered settled. From the government’s point of view Dr. Cuozzo was a threat to the French economy. Allocations of revenues to important programs could not be allowed to be threatened by some American “snake oil” salesman.

On the other hand French academicians were not prepared to have established Jurassic and Pleistocene periods tinkered with. Theoretically, Neanderthals had died out before the Magdalenian period (Cro-Magnon) in which artifacts in the La Madeleine (Dordogne region), France were discovered with fine carvings, including snakes. Whether Neanderthal or Cro-Magnon denominated, these were crafted by men. The same applied to the sketches in Bernifal Cave. Establishment scientist may not want to face the fact of a drawing of a confrontation between a dinosaur and a mammoth. It rocks their world.

The reason that Dr. Cuozzo went to France was to further his studies on the Neanderthal Man by examining remnant teeth and jaw bone fragments. He had developed his own theories about Neanderthals, and this book was a rather detailed study of French specimens (as well as others). For this reason he had brought along photography and x-ray equipment. His two oldest sons helped with the equipment.

Although many scientists wanted to place Neanderthals into a separate species from Cro-Magnon, or early Man, Dr. Cuozzo provided evidence based on detailed study of the skull, jaw, and teeth that established Neanderthals as Man. He offered reasons why Neanderthals and Cro-Magnon Man should be considered basically the same people.

One of his conclusions was that Neanderthals aged much slower than contemporary mankind. Just as the human head today grows longer between the ages of 20-30 and 60-70, creating a “different-looking” man, so the even slower growth of the Neanderthals, accompanied by a much longer age, created in the very mature specimens a “primitive-looking” face and large head.

The error among paleontologists was supposing that Neanderthals died at about the age of forty. As a matter of evolutionary principle, their theories demand a progressively longer duration of life from ancient to modern times in mankind. Hence, no matter how long a Neanderthal actually lived, he died about forty, according to the establishment in science. Theory trumps facts!

There is no good reason to believe that Neanderthals could not make and use tools to create artifacts and cave drawings found along with their bone fragments. Incidentally, the fragments by which individuals have been identified often were but a single bit of skull or a single tooth – often partial. Creativity and imagination – and prejudice – have informed the final depiction of an ape man, Neanderthal or Cro-Magnon. Entities such as National Geographic can skillfully morph the “evolution of man” on monitors, using skills first hinted at by Walt Disney in his animated cartoons.

Nor is there good reason to suppose that a Neanderthal is less intelligent than George W. Bush. Because establishment scientists depict a Neanderthal as a primitive, muscular being, they feel that they are distant from his kind. Neanderthals cannot have fine skills or even average intelligence. [“They’re not like us.”] However, there is a significant gap in accumulated knowledge between the average Neanderthal and the average Bush that must be granted.

This brings me back to the battle between the dinosaur and the mammoth. If the image photographed by Dr. Jack Cuozzo captured an interesting scene he witnessed, why could the scene itself be an accurate rendering of a scene witnessed by a cave-dweller, whether he be called Neanderthal or Cro-Magnon? The drawing IS the photograph of its era.

If it is accurate, then it establishes a revolutionary change in the timeline of life on Earth. As for radiocarbon dating, and other dating alternates, inaccuracies and artistic “needs” by scientists play a disquieting role. An unwanted time range may be cast aside as “impossible” because “it doesn’t fit.”

Finally, Dr. Cuozzo related not only a story of scientific sleuthing by him, but he drew into it a possible torture/murder of a friend, strange phone calls, French police/intelligence stalking, and much more to render this real-life episode an exciting, thought-provoking tale.

U.S. DECLARES WAR ON IRAN


Although the Ruling Circles that control American policy have struck a pose of alarm at the inexplicably truculent statements of the Iranian leadership, such leading Circles clearly were taken seriously only by the ignorant and the unfair. The United States has slowly but visibly tightened an economic noose around the Iranian nation and its financial holdings. All of this has been done as punishment for Iran’s development of nuclear energy to the point that American leaders fear Iran’s development of nuclear weapons.

These efforts by American leaders and their allies in Israel, England and the Continent, generally, to establish an economic embargo against Iran, based on phobic considerations of the future, were consistent with the Israeli doctrine of “Preventive Attacks” to forestall imagined, adverse developments.

There can be no doubt that a siege is an act of war. It initiates hostilities at a lower level. Its aim is to defeat the enemy outright, forcing surrender, or to compel it into negotiations. Clearly, the besieging nation will have the upper hand in such negotiations, creating an impression of victory.

Consider this description from Wikipedia:

“A siege is a military blockade of a city or fortress with the intent of conquering by attrition or assault. The term derives from sedere, Latin for "to sit".[1] Generally speaking, siege warfare is a form of constant, low intensity conflict characterized by one party holding a strong, static defensive position. Consequently, an opportunity for negotiation between combatants is not uncommon, as proximity and fluctuating advantage can encourage diplomacy.

A siege occurs when an attacker encounters a city or fortress that cannot be easily taken by a

coup de main and refuses to surrender. Sieges involve surrounding the target and blocking the reinforcement or escape of troops or provision of supplies (a tactic known as "investment"[2]), typically coupled with attempts to reduce the fortifications by means of siege engines, artillery bombardment, mining (also known as sapping), or the use of deception or treachery to bypass defences. Failing a military outcome, sieges can often be decided by starvation, thirst or disease, which can afflict either the attacker or defender.”

American intelligence on Iran and other Levantine arenas of interest has come disproportionately from the Israelis. The Israelis have had their share of Iranian Jews migrate to the Jewish state, but many others have remained in Iran. Hence, there have been Israelis possessed with intimate knowledge of Iranian culture probably since the 1960s, if not earlier. There are Jews in Iran that can – with care – be tapped for information.

Other nations such as Iraq also had Jewish populations to aid Israeli intelligence.

The fact that the Israelis have good intelligence about Levantine nations does not mean that they fully share this data with the United States. To advance Israeli interests, Israelis provide America with streams of data calculated to lead Americans along a course of action useful to the Israelis. They have the advantage of rich and powerful agents, well-organized and strategically positioned in the United States, who can create pressure to follow Israeli-created scenarios. This was vividly manifested by the Neo-Conservative Movement, which was dominated by Jews such as the Irving and William Kristol, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, et cetera.

As a matter of fact, according to Wikipedia, William Kristol was vigorously lobbying President Clinton for war in the Levant. Consider:

“Kristol was a leading proponent of the Iraq War. In 1998, he and other prominent foreign policy experts sent a letter to President Clinton urging a stronger posture against Iraq. Kristol argued that Saddam Hussein posed a grave threat to the United States and its allies: ‘The only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that Iraq will be able to use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction. In the near term, this means a willingness to undertake military action as diplomacy is clearly failing. In the long term, it means removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power. That now needs to become the aim of American foreign policy.’[7]

Clearly, precisely the same alarming commentary that was used to provoke and induce William Clinton and America into “nation building” in Iraq, and which was later successfully employed against the Bush Administration, generating the Second Desert Storm War, has been used today by the proponents of war with Iran.

The United States has electronic capacities, or high-tech capabilities, in intelligence to produce a certain level of understanding. However, interpretations may be required that may not be accurate. However, intelligence of this kind, joined with Israeli agents’ clandestine intelligence data, may produce an image that seems to be true. But is Israeli intelligence completely accurate? Up to a point. With an ally like Israel, the United States can never be sure that it is rolling a “Trojan horse” into Iran, as opposed to receiving one from Israel.

Probably the increasingly diverse immigration policies which have especially manifested themselves from the 1970s onward were partially motivated by a desire to get more effective agents operating in several problem areas of the world that were also thought to be key strategic loci. But control over such migrant agents for an amorphous culture such as modern America would itself be problematic. Not secured by the constraints of a lifetime American, such migrant agents would be ripe to become “double agents.” Where the American seedline does not even exist, migrant agents might well “take root” where “the money is greenest.”

I doubt that such agents will provide information that is any more useful than that of the Israelis. However, I do applaud any effort at liberating our intelligence from the nearly exclusive Levantine contributions of Israel (sic).

Virtually every day I hear a report on the radio that warns of new Iranian threats. They threaten here; they threaten us there. However, the actions of the United States have rarely been described as warlike or threatening. Many of the U.S. “black ops” against Iran were ignored by the radio station I listened to, by the television I watched, and by major newspapers’ front pages I saw. If small media outlets such as American Free Press did not exist, then I would never know about them at all.

Occasionally, something of the Stuxnet-type event occurs, and the American public gets a glimpse of Iran the Attacked, as opposed to the “diabolical fanatical, terrorist attacker.”

The United States has military bases all over the world. It has completely surrounded Iran with military bases. Complying with Israeli and Zionist pressure, the United States has led an economic embargo to surround and isolate Iran. Israelis have been fingered as the source of the Stuxnet virus that infected the Siemens computer devices used by Iran. Theoretically, this virus could infect Siemens-based cyber-systems around the globe.

Incidentally, the attacks on American computer system by “Chinese hackers” may actually be an Israeli-Chinese cyber-probe. The Israelis have worked with Chinese on various projects for years. The now-defunct Spotlight news-tabloid regularly reported on Israeli resell of American defense and high-tech equipment to China. The whole communist system in China was dependent on several Jewish advisers who were at Mao Tze-Tung’s side. Texe Marrs actually published a photograph of a young Mao standing amid five Jewish advisers, one of whom was honored by the Communist Party in the early 2000s.

It now appears that enemies of Iran in America are diligently working to create an “Iranian attack” on some structure in America which will justify President Obama declaring war on Iran to punish “evil in our time.” Every day on the radio, the radio experts discover some new Iranian terrorist cell or plot to create one. When that isn’t happening, al Qaeda is still threatening the U.S. I believe that it is inevitable that American media will report a “diabolical accord” between Iran and al Qaeda to blow up and/or burn down America. A wrathful American public will demand war. President Obama wins re-election.

Nevertheless, it appears that most of these “home-grown” terrorists more closely resemble typical “patsies” than legitimate threats. There appears to be a fedcop connection to almost all of them. The fedcops simulate potential terrorists/disgruntled Americans, who seem to be the sine qua non of the terrorist event that resulted in the arrest and media coverage.

One recalls the bromide: “Choose your enemies well, for you will become your enemy.”

Profile

mensched4time
mensched4time

Latest Month

April 2014
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel